On Explaining the Jaguar to People Who Don’t Understand

There are two types of people in this world.

Those who walk into my garage, see a 1967 Jaguar E-Type in British Racing Green, and go very quiet.

And those who say, almost immediately:

“How much is that going to cost you?”

You learn a great deal about a person from which sentence they lead with.

The first group understands that some things are not about cost.

The second group owns sensible sedans and speaks in extended warranties.

Now, let me be clear: I respect practicality. I own practicality. Practicality is currently sitting in my driveway, exposed to the elements like a responsible adult who pays taxes and files paperwork on time.

But practicality has never once made my pulse change.

The Jaguar does. Even though its tires are currently stacked in a corner of the garage.

This car is the essence of impracticality.

Explaining this to certain people is like describing literature to someone who exclusively reads instruction manuals. They are not wrong. They are simply oriented toward outcome over experience.

“You know those are unreliable, right?”

Yes. I am aware that British engineering in the 1960s occasionally treated electrical systems as a philosophical suggestion rather than a firm commitment.

“That thing’s going to live in your garage forever.”

Possibly. But so do most good intentions.

“Why wouldn’t you just buy something new?”

This question is always delivered with genuine concern, as though I have mistakenly selected a horse-drawn carriage for my daily commute.

Because new is not the point.

New is efficient. New is quiet. New is apologetically aerodynamic and engineered by committees who believe passion should be moderated.

The Jaguar was not designed by committee.

It was designed by someone who thought, “What if a car looked like desire?”

And then ignored everyone who raised their hand to suggest moderation.

When people don’t understand the Jaguar, what they are really saying is this:

---

Why would you voluntarily choose difficulty?

---

It is a fair question.

Difficulty is inconvenient. It requires patience. It demands skill. It humbles you in ways that modern convenience has almost entirely eliminated.

But difficulty also sharpens you.

Restoring this car has reminded me that not everything worthwhile arrives pre-assembled. Sometimes you must remove the carburetors, clean what has been neglected, replace what cannot be saved, and then reassemble it with a better understanding than you had before.

It is deeply irritating.

It is also deeply satisfying.

One gentleman—well-meaning, cautious—looked at the Jaguar and said, “You know you could flip that for a decent profit once it’s running.”

That is when I realized we were speaking entirely different dialects.

Flip it?

Sir, I am not renovating a duplex.

This car is not an asset class.

It is a narrative.

There is something about older machinery that unsettles modern people. It lacks compliance. It refuses to be optimized. It does not sync with your phone.

It simply exists.

And it expects you to meet it halfway.

When I tell people I did not ask my wife before buying it, their eyebrows perform a synchronized routine.

“She just… let you?”

Yes.

Because marriage, contrary to popular belief, is not about seeking permission for every autonomous decision. It is about trust.

I did not hide it. I did not leverage the mortgage. I used my own money to purchase a beautifully flawed object that makes me feel alive in a very specific way.

She assessed the situation, calculated the emotional return on investment, and said, essentially, “Fine. But it’s living in the garage.”

Which is fair.

The real tension arises when people conflate understanding with agreement.

“You don’t need that,” they say.

Of course I don’t.

Need is a survival word.

We need oxygen. We need water. We need community.

No one needs a 1967 Jaguar.

We choose it.

---

And choice is where character reveals itself.

---

When someone stands in my garage and questions the Jaguar, I resist the urge to defend it with data. I could reference its historical significance. I could cite its design legacy. I could mention that Enzo Ferrari once called it the most beautiful car ever made.

But none of that matters.

What matters is the way it makes me feel when I look at it.

It reminds me that not everything has to justify itself through utility.

It reminds me that beauty can exist without apology.

It reminds me that restoration is an act of respect.

People who don’t understand the Jaguar tend to live forward-facing lives. They are oriented toward the next thing, the improved thing, the thing that requires less effort and delivers more convenience.

There is nothing wrong with that.

But I have always been drawn to what already has a story.

To what has been driven.

To what has endured.

The Jaguar is not pristine. It carries scratches and age like a well-written sentence carries subtext. It has history in its seams.

When someone asks, “Is it worth it?” I want to respond with a question of my own.

Was the drive worth it? Or just the arrival?

We have become a culture obsessed with arrival. We measure life by milestones. Promotions. Purchases. Destinations reached.

Very few people pause to consider the road itself.

The Jaguar is not a fast solution. It is not an efficient commuter. It is not something you drive absentmindedly while listening to podcasts about productivity.

It requires engagement.

I am remembering how to drive a stick shift again.

You listen to it. You feel the shifts. You notice the temperature gauge. You become aware.

It forces you to participate.

That, more than anything, is what confuses people.

Participation is exhausting.

It is far easier to press a button and expect compliance.

One afternoon, a neighbor wandered into the garage and stood beside me in silence for a moment.

He did not ask about cost.

He did not mention reliability.

He ran his hand lightly over the fender and said, “They don’t make them like this anymore.”

No.

They do not.

And perhaps that is the entire point.

Explaining the Jaguar to people who don’t understand has become its own quiet amusement. I nod. I accept their caution. I even agree, in theory, that it is impractical.

Then I return to the garage.

Because not everything is meant to be understood by everyone.

Some things are meant to be restored slowly. Meant to challenge you. Meant to remind you that difficulty and beauty are not mutually exclusive.

One day soon, it will run the way it was intended.

And when it does, the same people who questioned it will say, “Well, I have to admit—that’s something.”

They will not apologize for their doubt.

They will simply adjust.

Which is, frankly, all I ever expected.

Until then, the Jaguar sits in the garage, unapologetic and slightly temperamental.

Much like its owner.